Training optimisation means different things for different people, and requires context in order to be defined appropriately.
In absolute training terms, optimal training could be considered to be the most effective way in which performance goals can be achieved. This could be the quickest and safest way to increase your powerlifting total, or improve your ranking in the CrossFit Open. For some professional athletes where performance is the be all and end all, this definition of optimal training will usually take priority when designing their training programme.
However, for the majority of individuals, a more holistic approach should be used when evaluating a training programme. Is the programme enjoyable? Does it allow for a balanced lifestyle? Is it varied enough to prevent monotony? For athletes whose livelihoods do not depend on sporting performance, the sustainability of the activity should be a key focus.
Too many coaches place too much emphasis on the training outcome, rather than on the athlete themselves. Yes, training must be progressive, but not at the cost of athlete disengagement. Yes, one particular programme may elicit continuous training improvements week by week, but can it be considered optimal if an athlete is not engaged with the programme and drops out after only a few months?
In order to optimise training for the majority of individuals, great effort should be made to make the programme as engaging as possible. Make it fun, allow for free time outside of training, and reap the rewards of continual training improvement over long extended periods. A happy athlete is a committed athlete. A committed athlete is a successful one.
If you want to find out more about how to improve your training structure get in touch.
Comments